World's most liveable cities
Contents
Monocle's Quality of Life Survey
Monocle's Quality of Life Survey 2014[1] | |||
---|---|---|---|
City | Country | ||
1 | Copenhagen | Denmark | |
2 | Tokyo | Japan | |
3 | Melbourne | Australia | |
4 | Stockholm | Sweden | |
5 | Helsinki | Finland | |
6 | Vienna | Austria | |
7 | Zürich | Switzerland | |
8 | Munich | Germany | |
9 | Kyoto | Japan | |
10 | Fukuoka | Japan | |
11 | Sydney | Australia | |
12 | Auckland | NZ | |
13 | Hong Kong | Hong Kong | |
14 | Berlin | Germany | |
15 | Vancouver | Canada | |
16 | Singapore | Singapore | |
17 | Madrid | Spain | |
18 | Paris | France | |
19 | Amsterdam | Netherlands | |
20 | Hamburg | Germany | |
21 | Barcelona | Spain | |
22 | Lisbon | Portugal | |
23 | Portland | USA | |
24 | Oslo | Norway | |
25 | Brisbane | Australia |
Important criteria in this survey are safety/crime, international connectivity, climate/sunshine, quality of architecture, public transportation, tolerance, environmental issues and access to nature, urban design, business conditions, pro-active policy developments and medical care.
The EIU's Global Liveability Ranking
The EIU's Global Liveability Ranking August 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
City | Country | Overall rating[2] | ||
1 | Melbourne | Australia | 97.5 | |
2 | Vienna | Austria | 97.4 | |
3 | Vancouver | Canada | 97.3 | |
4 | Toronto | Canada | 97.2 | |
5 | Adelaide | Australia | 96.6 | |
5 | Calgary | Canada | 96.6 | |
7 | Sydney | Australia | 96.1 | |
8 | Helsinki | Finland | 96.0 | |
9 | Perth | Australia | 95.9 | |
10 | Auckland | New Zealand | 95.7 | |
11 | Zurich | Switzerland | ||
12 | Geneva | Switzerland | ||
13 | Osaka | Japan | ||
14 | Hamburg | Germany | ||
15 | Stockholm | Sweden | ||
16 | Montreal | Canada | ||
17 | Paris | France | ||
18 | Frankfurt | Germany | ||
19 | Tokyo | Japan | ||
20 | Brisbane | Australia |
The Economist Intelligence Unit's (EIU) most recent liveability ranking shows cities in Australia, Canada, Austria, Finland and New Zealand as the ideal destinations, thanks to a widespread availability of goods and services, low personal risk, and an effective infrastructure. It does not take into account the cost of living as a factor in 'liveability'. The Economist Intelligence Unit has been criticised by the New York Times for being overly anglocentric, stating that "The Economist clearly equates livability with speaking English."[3] The August 2014 report placed Melbourne, Australia as the most liveable city in the world - due to Melbourne's tourist friendly Myki system and incredible house price gains, with Vienna, Austria taking second place, followed by Vancouver, Canada. Other Australian cities also ranked highly in the survey, with Adelaide continuing to hold equal 5th position (in company with Calgary in Canada). Sydney was at 7th position and Perth at 9th. A third Canadian city, Toronto was among the top ten, holding the 4th spot. Toronto is the largest city by population among the top ten cities, with nearly six million inhabitants within its metropolitan area. The Top 10 ranking order remains unchanged compared with 2012.[4] Although asian cities do not appear in the top 10, Osaka (Osaka Prefecture), Japan is ranked as Asia's most liveable city. At the bottom end of the scale, the 2013 report lists Damascus (Syria) as worst, followed by Tehran (Iran), Douala (Cameroon), Tripoli (Libya), Karachi (Pakistan), Algiers (Algeria), Harare (Zimbabwe), Lagos (Nigeria), Port Moresby (Papua New Guinea) and Dhaka (Bangladesh).
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti